DukeEthicist: hard line on hazing
(02/17/12 7:00pm)
How should we evaluate the merits of hazing through both an ethical and cultural lens?Generic Script
Use the fields below to perform an advanced search of The Chronicle's archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query. You can also try a Basic search
15 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.
How should we evaluate the merits of hazing through both an ethical and cultural lens?Generic Script
In light of the recent focus on a certain frat party at Duke, what are the ethical responsibilities of partying?
So what about Joe Paterno?
Movement for the sake of Movement = No Answers.
To what extent does the administration have the responsibility to uphold the community standard (i.e. with complete transparency/honesty of administrative expenditures), and would their violations of the community standard be more permissible?
What is the true purpose of a community standard, and how can we measure its success on campus?
What is your responsibility to intervene with a friend who has unhealthy habits, and at what point is intervention unhelpful or counter-productive?
When is it reasonably appropriate to use the STINF?
Do you have a responsibility as a student to bring about campus change, and do certain circumstances or contexts influence the extent of that responsibility?
What does the Trinity-Pratt rivalry look like from an ethical standpoint?
What is the distinction between making my accomplishments stand out and resume padding?
Is it morally right to spend so much money on the basketball program (estimated 1.3 million on the chartered flight to China), knowing the high cost of Duke's tuition and other products and food available on campus? Should we leave the lavish treatment of the players to the NBA after they graduate?
Should institutions of higher education like Duke prioritize teaching pre-professional and marketable job skills over teaching a sold liberal arts curriculum? Duke has no business, marketing, finance, or other explicitly pre-professional degrees, but I think the mainstream focus on campus is to prepare students for entering business, law, medicine, or other professional fields. I find the Markets & Management Studies certificate and the Master of Management Studies degree to be particularly troubling instances of this mentality.
As ambitious Duke students, is our desire to make money in finance a good thing or a bad thing? Are there ways to make lots of money that are more ethical than others?
Is it ethical for a Duke engineer – who could feasibly contribute in many ways to society and solve humanity’s biggest problems – to instead go to Wall Street purely for financial gains?