Search Results


Use the fields below to perform an advanced search of The Chronicle's archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query. You can also try a Basic search




2 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.



An open invitation to move

(04/10/13 7:49am)

Instead of attempting to actively change some of the policies currently working their way through the North Carolina legislature, I would urge all Duke students (and all North Carolinians in general) to voice their dissatisfaction with the government’s current trajectory by leaving the state. In a knowledge-based economy, we are the state’s most important asset. We are the intelligent, creative people who have helped make areas like the Triangle vibrant and economically competitive. By voting with our feet and deserting North Carolina, we can reward areas of the country that are implementing progressive policies, while pressuring North Carolina lawmakers to reconsider their social policies.


Response to “Web of relationships complicates nomination process”

(02/01/13 9:21am)

The Young Trustee Nominating Committee is far from perfect, but its members are not to blame. A qualified applicant for YT is someone with a broad range of experiences at Duke who has built a robust network of personal connections. Thus, no matter who vets YT applicants, there are bound to be conflicts of interest. I contest the assertion that this year’s process was biased. This year’s YTNC was more open than ever before in letting applicants know about conflicts, and we proactively set up a process to allow applicants the opportunity to voice their concerns about conflicts (which none of them felt the need to do). Members with major conflicts of interest could not speak about or vote on those candidates—their opinions had no influence in the process. The YTNC considered every applicant seriously and voted for those they thought would make the best YT.