I am responding to the Editorial Board's March 25 column "(Purchase) power of donors." In the column, the authors made a disturbing reference to the Duke lacrosse scandal, mentioning that the scandal highlighted "sexual assault, gender privilege and racial discrimination" at Duke.
I am responding to Sabriyya Pate's Oct. 24 editorial "The 'nasty woman' DSG needs."
I am responding to "fari nzinga's" absolutely appalling 7 April editorial. In particular, I was horrified by their comments regarding the Duke lacrosse allegations of 2006.
I would like to share my observations from the DukeEnrage protest in front of the Delta Sigma Phi section.
Duke basketball has the best fans in the world, bar none. Or at least we used to have the best fans in the world.
I am responding to your 16 Sept. editorial entitled "Legacy admissions: something given for little returned." In your article, you state, among other ridiculous untruths, that "those that believe legacy students bring a coherent or uniquely beneficial background to Duke are deluding themselves." In other words, you believe that legacy students do not belong at Duke.
