Reluctant Advocate
Biweekly Sass
By: Lindsay White
Issue date: 4/23/07 Section: Columns
Last update: 4/23/07 at 11:08 AM EST
Last update: 4/23/07 at 11:08 AM EST
- Page 1 of 2 next >
|
We've still got a long way to go in the Research Triangle, easily one of the crappiest place in the country to be an animal.
Our tiny victory did not get much publicity, and I would venture to say it's really only known in certain very small circles. I would also venture to say that, by this point in the column, many of you have stopped reading. You may be rolling your eyes. Some of my friends are muttering, "Oh God, there she goes..." with the occasional guy chuckling about how, "Lindsay doesn't eat meat."
Because the animal rights movement is neither popular nor sexy. It's a tiny blip on the radar at Duke, completely dwarfed by the mad pursuit of science and a culture that scoffs at this kind of fuzzy, sentimental activism. You won't see, out on the main quad, a pinwheel for every animal maimed or killed in Duke's many labs. And any kind of protest at our very own on-campus vivarium during this week's World Week for Animals in Laboratories is bound to be lackluster.
But I'm not on the front lines of the movement at Duke, and very few of us are. There is a certain self-consciousness, an awkwardness that comes with taking on this kind of cause. I'm reluctant to join up with D-SPA or any equivalent organization, because taking on un-popular, un-mainstream activism is something which would make me a little more vulnerable than I'd like to be-like baring my Achilles' heel. I would also be opening myself up to all kinds of stigma, a whole stream of labels and assumptions.
There is something inherently personal about taking up a cause like this and, though it isn't really a justification for doing nothing at all, the reluctance to speak out and protest is not completely irrational.
There are mainstream causes; however, I don't bat an eyelash at someone tabling for Darfur or global warming. I'm not undermining their validity, but these are causes which have become common enough in our culture that we don't really question why someone is taking them on. It seems a matter of course. Common sense. But, then again, with every cause, comes the subconscious questions, the why we ponder when we find out someone is interning at National Abortion Rights Action League or writing their congressman about immigration. We can recognize the legitimacy of these causes and their implications for our society and country, but in the back of our minds is always the assumption that it's something personal.
2008 Woodie Awards



Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
Nas is half man, half amazing
posted 4/23/07 @ 1:55 PM EST
Thank you Lindsey, for not providing us with the typical end-of-the-year column giving the freshmen advice on how to go through college, or giving us a list of regrets or whatnot. (Continued…)
Jamie
posted 4/24/07 @ 12:42 AM EST
Lindsay,
I always enjoy reading your columns, but I have to disagree with you on this one. I don't think that most pro-choice women are pro-choice because we anticipate needing abortions in the future. (Continued…)
Eva
posted 4/24/07 @ 4:11 PM EST
Awesome column! I'm also an animal-rights Republican, and our numbers are growing. Ben Stein, Matthew Scully and other prominent conservatives are realizing this a moral issue, not just touchy-feely sentiment. (Continued…)
Post a Comment